The Realm of Federalism: Appreciation to a Prospective Shift on the Form of Philippine Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v2i1.24Keywords:
local government; central government; federalism; system of government of the Philippines; prospective shift; government transition; challenges during transition; benefits of federalismAbstract
The current administration of the Republic of the Philippines is seen as an ardent advocate of federalism. This research study purports to explore the appreciation and understanding of the youth – specifically the Liberal Arts students in higher educational institutions who have the knowledge on the government forms, laws, and history of our system of government as regards a possible shift in the system of government. This study utilized descriptive qualitative design through Collaizi’s method of data analysis. Findings show that informants having perceived the possible shift on the system of government of the Philippines, have led to three clustered themes namely: (1) federalism defined, (2) benefits of federalism, and, (3) possible challenges during the transition period. Moreover, it is concluded that informants defined federalism as a system of government where powers are being decentralized to the local government and the latter being independent from the national / central government. Standardized local legislation, increased economic status, and responsive local government were identified as the benefits of federalism. Lack of proper knowledge, constitutional proceedings and amendments, and, costly and time-consuming were cited as the possible challenges during the transition period on the shift in our system of government. We suggest that, in order to actualize federalism, there is a need to enhance governance capabilities through transparency and accountability and a clearer definition of local autonomy should be observed.
References
Abragan, A. B., Bracero, R. L., Sinconiegue, S. G., & Viloria, L. S. (2013). Philippine government structural reform from unitary to federal: Views from government and private sectors. Panel 13: Public Administration. Retrieved on February 25, 2017 from: https://goo.gl/R6xyAT
Ahmed, S. G. (2016). The Constitutional Structures of the Federalism in the Middle East. Journal of Humanity Sciences, 20(3), 370-394.
Ardanaz, M., Leiras, M., & Tommasi, M. (2014). The politics of federalism in Argentina and its implications for governance and accountability. World Development, 53, 26-45.
Bednar, J. (2011). The political science of federalism. Retrieved on November 27, 2016 from: http://www.annualreviews.org/eprint/RKEzimnRdkykewvgNyq8/full/
Bell, C. (2011). Peace Agreements and the Law of Peace: A Consultative Paper Exploring Issues Relevant to Peace Processes in the Philippines.
Boex, J., & Kelly, R. (2013).Fiscal Federalism and Intergovernmental Financial Relations. The International Handbook of Public Financial Management (pp. 259-280). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Retrieved on November 29, 2016 from: https://goo.gl/iH7QKB
Boffa, F., Piolatto, A., & Ponzetto, G. A. (2016). Political centralization and government accountability. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 381-422.
Brillantes, A. B., & Fernandez, M. T. F. T. (2011). Restoring trust and building integrity in government: Issues and concerns in the Philippines and areas for reform. International Public Management Review, 12(2), 55-80.
Castillo, R. M. (2011). Federalism and its potential application to the Republic of the Philippines. Philippines: University of Santo Thomas. Retrieved on November 23, 2016 from: https://goo.gl/2tmoxZ
Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation?. Children and youth services review, 33(2), 340-345.
Christens, B. D., & Dolan, T. (2011). Interweaving youth development, community development, and social change through youth organizing. Youth & Society, 43(2), 528-548.
Christin, T., & Hug, S. (2012). Federalism, the geographic location of groups, and conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(1), 93-122.
Curato, N. (2015). Deliberative capacity as an indicator of democratic quality: The case of the Philippines. International Political Science Review, 36(1), 99-116.
Dahiye, M. I. (2014). Federalism and national stability: the case of Somalia 1999-2013 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Diaz‐Serrano, L., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2012). Decentralization, Subjective Well‐Being, and the Perception of Institutions. Kyklos, 65(2), 179-193.
Dressel, B. (2011). The Philippines: how much real democracy?. International Political Science Review, 32(5), 529-545.
Du, E. C. (2013). Federalizing the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) for Good Governance and Quality Public Service. 한국행정학회 추계학술발표논문집, 2013(단일호), 2561-2568.
Emmerson, D. K. (2012). Minding the gap between democracy and governance. Journal of democracy, 23(2), 62-73.
Esselment, A. L. (2011). Birds of a feather? The role of partisanship in the 2003 Ontario government transition. Canadian Public Administration, 54(4), 465-486.
Feld, L. P. (2014). James Buchanan’s theory of federalism: from fiscal equity to the ideal political order. Constitutional Political Economy, 25(3), 231-252.
Giuliano, P., Mishra, P., & Spilimbergo, A. (2012). Democracy and reforms: evidence from a new dataset (No. w18117). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Head, B. W. (2011). Why not ask them? Mapping and promoting youth participation. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 541-547.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2013). Beyond federalism: Estimating and explaining the territorial structure of government. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 43(2), 179-204.
Hutchcroft, Paul D., and Joel Rocamora. "Patronage-Based Parties and the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines." (2011).
Ikeanyibe, O. M. (2016). Federalism, constitutionalism, and local government autonomy in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3 S1), 383
Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2012). Federal institutions and the democratic transition: Learning from South Africa. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 28(4), 783-817.
Jeffery, C., Pamphilis, N. M., Rowe, C., & Turner, E. (2014). Regional policy variation in Germany: the diversity of living conditions in a ‘unitary federal state’. Journal of European public policy, 21(9), 1350-1366.
Kaufman, S. J. (2013). The limits of nation-building in the Philippines.International Area Studies Review, 16(1), 3-23.
Kogan, V., Lavertu, S., & Peskowitz, Z. (2015). Performance federalism and local democracy: Theory and evidence from school tax referenda. American Journal of Political Science.
Lacorte, G. (2016). Duterte: Polls on federalism in two years. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved on November 26, 2016 from: https://goo.gl/gxfAi9
Matsuda, Y. (2011). Ripe for a big bang? assessing the political feasibility of legislative reforms in the Philippines' local government code.
Medrano, J., Villanueva, K., & Tindowen, D. J. (2016). Rice combine harvester: Its effects to the livelihood of rice-field tenants in a second class municipality. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(4), 112-118.
Mohamoud, M. A. (2015). Federalism for Somalia: Internal and external challenges in the post-transitional period. Retrieved on November 27, 2016 from: https://goo.gl/Au0vwv
Morley, M. T. (2016). Dismantling the Unitary Electoral System? Uncooperative Federalism in State and Local Elections.
Neudorfer, B., & Neudorfer, N. S. (2015). Decentralization and political corruption: Disaggregating regional authority. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 45(1), 24-50.
Nieswiadomy, R. M. (2008). Foundations of nursing research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Northam, K. (2014). The Challenge of Youth Engagement in Local Government: Exploring the Use of Youth Councils in Amherst and Halifax Regional Municipality, Nova Scotia.
Nye, J. V. (2011). Taking institutions seriously: rethinking the political economy of development in the Philippines.
Öktem, M. K. (2014). Problems and Challenges in the Transition Toward Local Governance in Turkey. Lex Localis, 12(4), 751.
Pietsch, J. (2015). Authoritarian durability: Public opinion towards democracy in Southeast Asia. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 25(1), 31-46.
Poblador, N. S. (2016). The false promise of federalism.Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved on November 23, 2016 from: https://goo.gl/GOnZuA
Rifqinizamy, M. (2013). The Doctrine of Federalism in an Unitarian State: A Study of Local Autonomy in Indonesia and Devolution Power in United Kingdom. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(1), 91-97.
Robson, W. B., & Laurin, A. (2015). Adaptability, Accountability and Sustainability: Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements in Canada.
Ruiz-Rufino, R. (2013). Satisfaction with democracy in multi-ethnic countries: The effect of representative political institutions on ethnic minorities. Political Studies, 61(1), 101-118.
Sampa, E. (2013). Rudiments of qualitative research designs and analysis (1st Ed.). Philippines: Rex Printing Company, Inc.
Sloam, J. (2012). ‘Rejuvenating democracy?’Young people and the ‘Big Society’project. Parliamentary affairs, 65(1), 90-114.
Sorens, J. (2011). The institutions of fiscal federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(2), 207-231.
Tayao, E. (2016). Pursuing Federalism in the Philippines: the context of state and democratization1. Federalism and decentralization: perceptions for political and institutional reforms, 119.
Teehankee, J. C. (2016). Weak State, Strong Presidents: Situating the Duterte Presidency in Philippine Political Time. Journal of Developing Societies, 32(3), 293-321.
Thom-Otuya, B. E. (2013). Strenghtening Nigeria’s Federalism for National Development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(5), 27.
Timberman, D. G. (2016). Elite Democracy Disrupted?. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 135-144.
Tindowen, D. J. C. (2016). The Economic Life of the Aetas of Northern Philippines. Khazar Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 19(4).
Von Hagen, J. (2016). Fiscal Federalism: Public Goods, Transfers, and Common Pools. Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 10(2), 41-75.
Yilmaz, S., & Venugopal, V. (2013). Local government discretion and accountability in Philippines. Journal of International Development, 25(2), 227-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Daisy Luyun, Angelica Mamauag, Eladio Martin Gumabay, Darin Jan Tindowen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
