The gap between the Individual and the State in neoliberal doctrine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v2i1.58Keywords:
Neoliberalism, Individualism, Minimal state, Structural inequalityAbstract
Neoliberalism mainly revolves around the issue of individual freedom and equal opportunities. However, studies of the real expressions of neoliberal doctrine show a gap between the expected benefits of the free market and its actual effects. This essay seeks to understand these contradictions, exploring the way in which the neoliberal discourse forged a distance between the State and the individual on the premise of individual freedom. Thus, the objective is to understand how neoliberal individualist discourse drains the State’s public role and fosters structural inequality. This investigation is done through a theoretical and qualitative approach, based on literature review. The essay explores the origin of neoliberalism as an economic ideology, the theoretical and practical incompatibilities it presents, the neoliberal promotion of individualism and the consequent separation between the individual and the State. The conclusion is that the individualist and meritocratic ideology defended by neoliberalism serves the purpose of holding the individual responsible as an entrepreneur of himself instead of prioritizing government action and policy, ultimately serving private interests and accentuating socioeconomic inequality.
References
ANDRADE, D. P. O que é o neoliberalismo? A renovação do debate nas ciências sociais. Sociedade e Estado, vol. 34, n. 1, 2019, pp. 211-239.
BÉLAND, D. Neoliberalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Ownership. Policy Studies, vol. 28, n. 2, 2007, pp. 91-107.
BOAS, T.C.; GANS-MORSE, J. Neoliberalism: From New Liberal Philosophy to Anti-Liberal Slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 44. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9040-5, fev. 2009, pp. 137-161.
CROUCH, C. From Markets versus States to Corporations versus Civil Society? In: SCHÄFER, A.; STREECK, W. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013, pp. 219-238.
FIORI, J. L. Globalização, hegemonia e império. In: TAVARES, M. C.; FIORI, J. L. (orgs.) Poder e dinheiro: Uma economia política da globalização. 7ª Edição, Editora Vozes, 1998, pp. 87-147.
HARVEY, D. O Estado neoliberal. In: O neoliberalismo: história e implicações. 5ª Edição, São Paulo: Editora Loyola, 2005, pp. 37-48.
HENRY, J. F. The Ideology of the Laissez Faire Program. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 42, n. 1, mar. 2008, pp. 209-224.
LAZZARATO, M. Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, n. 6, 2009, pp. 109-133.
MANDARINI, M. B.; ALVES, A. M.; STICCA, M. G. Terceirização e impactos para a saúde e trabalho: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, vol. 16, n. 2, abr-jun 2016, pp. 143-152.
MILANOVIC, B. Liberal Meritocratic Capitalism. In: Capitalism, alone: the future of the system that rules the world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019, pp. 12-66.
MONBIOT, G. Neoliberalism: the ideology at the root of all our problems. The Guardian, Londres, mar. 2016. Seção de Cultura. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot. Acesso em: 20/06/2020.
PAULANI, L. M. Neoliberalismo e Individualismo. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, vol. 13, dez. 1999, pp. 115-127.
STIGTLIZ, J. E. America’s 1 Percent Problem. In: The price of inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York, Londres: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012, pp. 23-42.
STREECK, W. The crisis in context: democratic capitalism and its contradictions. In: SCHÄFER, A.; STREECK, W. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013, pp. 262-286.
WEISS, L. Globalization and State Power. Development and Society, vol. 29, n. 1, jun. 2000, pp. 1-15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Vitória Benaci Irusta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.