Beyond body and mind: psychology and the unity of the human person in Aquinas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v5i1.689Keywords:
Thomas Aquinas, Human Person, Body, Soul, Mind, Psychology, PhilosophyAbstract
Abstract
Human persons are at once simple and complex: simple, because they possess a unified and indivisible essence in the form of the soul; and, complex, since this immaterial soul is conjoined to a material body, accounting for the human whole. This paper highlights the nature of this union and explores the psychology of the human person based on Thomistic philosophical tradition. Our thesis is that Aquinas’s hylomorphism, which counters in advance the claims of Descartes on human identity, offers a comprehensive understanding of the human person and provides a robust foundation that understands the human person as transcending the limitations of body and mind, and this has implications for philosophical, psychological and scientific enquiries.
References
Bazán, Bernando Carlos (1997). The human soul: form and substance? Thomas Aquinas’ Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism. Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age (64) 95-126.
Brennan, Robert (1941). Thomistic Psychology: A Philosophic Analysis of the Nature of Man. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Brock, Stephen (2005). The Physical Status of the Spiritual Soul in Thomas Aquinas. Nova et Vetera, English edition (3/2) 231-258.
Cassirer, Ernst (2021). An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture, with an Introduction by Peter Gordon, Veritas paperback edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Copleston, Fredrick (2003). A History of Philosophy, vol. 2: Medieval Philosophy. From Augustine to Duns Scotus. London: Continuum.
Cory, David (2020). Thomas Aquinas on How the Soul Moves the Body. Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, vol. 8, ed. Robert Pasnau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 144-186.
Coulter, Gregory (1990). Aquinas on the Identity of Mind and Substantial Form. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association (64) 161-179.
Cuddy, Cajetan (2016). “Introduction: Science, Philosophy, and Thomas Aquinas,” in Robert Edward Brennan, OP, Thomistic Psychology: A Philosophic Analysis of the Nature of Man, Edited with a new Introduction by Cajetan Cuddy. Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media, i-vi.
Dewan, Lawrence (1984). St. Thomas and the Integration of Knowledge into Being. International Philosophical Quarterly (24) 383–393.
Emery, Gilles (2000). L’unité de l’homme, âme et corps, chez S. Thomas d’Aquin. Nova et Vetera (75/2) 53-76.
Fisher, Kendall A. (2017). Thomas Aquinas on hylomorphism and the in-act principle. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (25/6) 1053-1072.
García-Valdecasas, Miguel (2005). Psychology and Mind in Aquinas. History of Psychiatry (16/3) 291-310.
Gilson1, Etienne (2016). Being and Some Philosophers. Ontario, CA: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
Gilson2, Etienne (1956). The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, trans. L. K. SHOOK. New York: Random House.
Gilson3, Etienne (1960). The Elements of Christian Philosophy. New York: Doubleday.
Gleen, Paul (2007). A Tour of the Summa of St. Thomas Aquinas. Bangalore: Theological Publications in India.
Gratsch, Edward (2008). Aquinas’ Summa, An Introduction and Interpretation. Bangalore: Theological Publications in India.
Kelly, Matthew J. (1967). Aquinas and the Subsistence of the Soul: Notes on a Difficulty. Franciscan Studies 27 (1967): 213-219.
Lawhead, William (2002). A Voyage of Discovery: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy, 2nd edition, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Mondin, Battista (1985). Philosophical Anthropology: Man, an impossible project? Bangalore: Theological Publications in India.
Nichols, Terence L. (1996). Aquinas’ Conception of Substantial Form and Modern Science. International Philosophical Quarterly (36/3) 303-318.
O’Donnell, Robert (1956). Hooked on Philosophy: Thomas Aquinas Made Easy. New York: St. Paul/Alba House.
Oguejiofor, Josaphat (2001). The Philosophical Significance of Immortality in Thomas Aquinas. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
Owens, Joseph (1963). The Unity in a Thomistic Philosophy of Man. Medieval Studies (25) 54-82.
Regan, Richard J. (2003). “Introduction,” in THOMAS AQUINAS, A Summary of Philosophy, trans. and ed., Richard J. REGAN. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Stump, Eleonore (2006). “Resurrection, Reassembly, and Reconstitution: Aquinas on the Soul,” in Die menschliche Seele: Brauchen wir den Dualismus? The Human Soul: Do We Need Dualism? Eds. Bruno NIEDERBERGER and Edmund RUNGGALDIER. Frankfurt-London: OntosVerlag, 153-174.
Sweeney, Michael J. (1999). Soul as Substance and Method in Thomas Aquinas’ Anthropological Writings. Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age (66) 143-187.
Thomas Aquinas1 (1999). On Human Nature, ed. Thomas S. Hibbs. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.
Thomas Aquinas (1949). Quaestiones disputatae de anima, translated as ‘The Soul’ by John Patrick Rowan. St. Louis & London: B. Herder Book Co.
Thomas Aquinas (2017). Summa Theologiae, 2nd and rev. edition, trans. The English Dominican Province, online edition.
Thomas Aquinas (2010). Summa Contra Gentiles. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anthony Athanasius Udoh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
