The decline of social freedoms in times of pandemic: ¿a necessary turning point or the path of no return?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v2i1.73Keywords:
Social Control, Social Freedoms, PandemicAbstract
The governments of the world, inspired by the strategies of supervision and social immobility created by Chinese authoritarianism, under the pretext of combating the pandemic, have implemented technological tools such as geolocation, facial recognition and manipulation of Big Data, among others, which has strengthened the abuse of individual freedoms. The present research was carried out under a qualitative approach with a documentary review methodology of narrative type, nourished by primary and secondary sources of information. The design was a cross-sectional study conducted in the year 2020 with a non-experimental level. The objective of this work was to know the current state of social freedoms at a global level as a consequence of the application of control strategies and social immobility in the fight against the Covid-19 virus. It was found a downward trend in the index of social freedoms in the world -both in countries with authoritarian governments as well as in those called democratic- in the 2 years prior to the pandemic, being 2020, the year of the beginning of the pandemic, when violations intensified the most. Among the main conclusions is that there is a sustained fall in the index of civil liberties at the international level, regardless of the political definition of government and the degree of development of the country. While social control and authoritarianism are part of Asian culture, in democratic countries, citizens have surrendered social freedoms in the name of protection and security from contagion.
References
Cámara Interamericana de los Derechos Humanos (CIDH). (2020). Pandemia y Derechos Humanos en las Américas. Recuperado de: https://www.oas.org/es/cidh/decisiones/pdf/Resolucion-1-20-es.pdf
De la Mora, G. (2020) Aislamiento social y vigilancia para contener la pandemia or Covid-19, algunas acciones de gobiernos y actores sociales. Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias CRIM. N° 26 junio 2020. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. (UNAM). p.4. Recuperado de: http://ru.crim.unam.mx/handle/123456789/66
Freedom House (2020a). Democracy Under Lockdown. Recuperado de: https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-report/2020/democracy-under-lockdown
Freedom House (2020b). Global Freedom Score. Recuperado de: https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores
Freedom House (2020c). Internet Freedom Score. Recuperado de: https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-net/scores
Germaín, M. (2020) Pandemia, redes sociales y gobiernos de las emociones. Rep Hip UNR. Universidad Nacional De Rosario. (UNR) Argentina. Recuperado de: http://rephip.unr.edu.ar/handle/2133/18864
Gershgorn, D. (9/4/2020). We Mapped How the Coronavirus Is Driving New Surveillance Programs Around the World. One Zero. Recuperado de: https://onezero.medium.com/the-pandemic-is-a-trojan-horse-for-surveillance-programs-around-the-world-887fa6f12ec9
Han, B. (24/03/2020). La Emergencia Viral y el Mundo del Mañana. Diario El País. Recuperado de: https://elpais.com/ideas/2020-03-21/la-emergencia-viral-y-el-mundo-de-manana-byung-chul-han-el-filosofo-surcoreano-que-piensa-desde-berlin.html
Hariri, Y.N. (22/03/2020). La Mejor Defensa Contra los Patógenos, es la Información. El País de España. Recuperado de: https://elpais.com/cultura/2020-03- 21/yuval-noah-harari-la-mejor-defensa-contra-los-p atogenos-es-la-informacion.html
Huotari, P. y Teivainen, T. (2020). Gobernanza Global y Horizontes Democráticos más allá del Coronavirus. En Blinger, B. y Pleyers, G. (Eds.) Alerta Global. Políticas, movimientos sociales y futuros en disputa en tiempos de Pandemia. p.77. Finlandia. Fundación: Biblioteca Clacso. Recuperado de: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20200826014541/Alerta-global.pdf
ONUSIDA. Programa Conjunto de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) sobre el VIH/SIDA (2020). Los Derechos Humanos en Tiempos de Covid-19. Recuperado de: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/human-rights-and-covid-19_es.pdf
The Economist. Intellingence Unit. (2018). Democracy Index 2018. ¿Me too? Recuperado de: https://275rzy1ul4252pt1hv2dqyuf-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Democracy_Index_2018.pdf
The Economist. Intellingence Unit. (2019). Democracy Index 2019. A year of Democracy set backs. Recuperado de: https://www.in.gr/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Democracy-Index-2019.pdf
The Economist. Intellingence Unit. (2020). Democracy Index 2020. In Sickness and in Health
Valle, F., Vega, F., Morocho, J., Gutierrez, J. y Reyes, M. (2020). Covid-19: lecciones tempranas de un nuevo paradigma en el proceso de globalización. Journal of Research and Opinion. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15520/jro.v7i4.61
Vommaro, P. (2020). Durante y después de la pandemia: dimensiones sociales, políticas y económicas. En Blinger, B. y Pleyers, G. (Eds.) Alerta Global. Políticas, movimientos sociales y futuros en disputa en tiempos de Pandemia. p.167. Finlandia. Fundación: Biblioteca Clacso. Recuperado de: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20200826014541/Alerta-global.pdf
Zastrow, M. (2020). Coronavirus contact-tracing apps: can they slow the spread of COVID-19? Nature Research Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01514-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Martiniano Reyes Olivo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.