Influence of FG Vega Technique on students’ academic performance in science 8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v2i2.97Keywords:
FG Vega technique, academic performance, traditional teachingAbstract
This study was conducted to determine the influence of the FG Vega technique on students' academic performance to address the least learned competency in Science 8. Seventy students from Grade 8 classes served as respondents of the study. The study employed a quasi-experimental method. The mean score of students who took the post-test is 32.03 and 27.57 respectively for the experimental and control group. The results can be gleaned that the score of each student in the experimental group has a little variation of mean with 6.71 as compared to the control group with a variation of 7.52. The results can be observed that the mean score of students in the pre-test under the control group is 8.80 and 11.34 under the experimental group. Thus, the results of the study can be further concluded that the students under the experimental group outperformed the students in the control group. Since the significant level is lesser than the p-value of 0.05, indicates that there is a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test under the experimental group. Hence, there is a significant difference between the post-test of the experimental and control group.
References
Barredo, K.J. (2013). "Development on the Academic Performance in Science using Strategic Intervention Material." Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/296475030/Development-on-the-Academic-Performance-in-Science
Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
DepEd Order 8, s. 2015. Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson.teacher's*resource*book*pp.!1-30.!Englewood!Cliffs,!NJ:!Prentice!Hall.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Gurney, J. (2016). "Revealed: World pupil rankings in science and maths - TIMSS results in full." Telegraph Education. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2016/11/29/revealed-world-pupil-rankings-science-maths-timss-results
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383- 434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Kirshenbaum, S. (2009). What Is Scientific Literacy?. Retrieved from https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/what-is-scientific-literacy-02
Majoka, M. I., Dad, M. H., & Mahmood, T. (2010, December). Student team achievement division (STAD) as an active learning strategy: Empirical evidence from mathematics classroom. Journal of Education and Sociology, p. 16
Molla, E., & Muche, M. (2018). Impact of Cooperative Learning Approaches on Students’ Academic Achievement and Laboratory Proficiency in Biology Subject in Selected Rural Schools, Ethiopia. Education Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 6202484, 9 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6202484
Olsen, R. E., & Kagan, S. 1992. About cooperative learning. In C. Kessler (Ed.). Cooperative language learning: A teacher's resource book pp. 1-30. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rattanatumm, T., & Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of the STAD model and problem-based learning in mathematics learning achievement and problem-solving ability. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 194-199.
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?", Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 4-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Zakrajsek, T. (2017). Students Who Don’t Participate in Class Discussions: They Are Not All Introverts. Associate Professor - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved from https://www.scholarlyteacher.com/post/students-who-dont-participate-in-class-discussions
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Franco Gil A. Vega, Merlyn M. Lasaca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
